Change, Adversity, and Adaptation: Young People’s Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic Expressed through Artwork and Semi-structured Interviews (preprint)

This study explores how young people’s mental health was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic using artwork and semi-structured interviews. This is important to understand so that policy and practice professionals can support those affected, prepare, and respond to future crises, and support young people who are isolated and restricted in other contexts. Co-designed participatory art workshops and interviews were conducted with 16–18-year-olds (N = 21) from the London-based Longitudinal cohort Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (SCAMP). Artworks and interview transcripts were qualitatively co-analysed with young people. From interviews, six themes were identified: adaptation, restriction, change, challenges, overcoming adversity, and lockdown life. From artwork, four themes were identified; trapped, negative mental wellbeing, positive emotions, and technology. Everyday factors such as home environment, relationships, hobbies, habits, and education or work were key determinants of how challenged and restricted participants felt, and their capacity to overcome this. This implies that young people’s mental health services should collaborate with other sectors to address wider life determinants in a holistic way, and that clearer guidance and support in these areas could mitigate the negative mental health impacts of major environmental changes on young people.

Establishing an Intensive Care follow up clinic for patients in Belfast, Northern Ireland

Introduction: National guidance states that follow up should be offered to all patients who have spent more than four days in intensive care1 with specific guidance for the follow up of COVID patients released in May 2020.2 Prior to the pandemic, in the Belfast trust, there was no follow-up service provided for intensive care patients. The pandemic presented many new challenges to intensive care, with a high number of patients requiring follow up after discharge. It also presented a unique problem in that follow up clinics could not be delivered in the traditional face to face manner. Objective(s): To set up a follow up service that assessed patient recovery from COVID 19 and offered rehabilitation, in a manner that could be delivered safely during a national lockdown. Method(s): A database was collated of all the patients who had been treated in intensive care, during the first wave of the pandemic with a confirmed positive COVID-19 sample. A follow up pathway (Figure 1) was designed for the clinic based on the BTS and FICM guidelines.2-3 The multidisciplinary team used Microsoft Teams to complete clinic proformas for each patient, share files and perform virtual appointments. Patient questionnaires were collated using the forms app within MS Teams. Patients filled in various objective health questionnaires at both their 6 and 12 week appointments to allow the team to assess their rehabilitation. Once the appointments were completed the proformas were entered into their permanent medical record on the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record (NIECR). Result(s): There were 42 patients treated in the pandemic's first wave, 40 were reviewed at 6 weeks and 39 at 12 weeks post hospital discharge. Anonymous feedback was gathered electronically from patients about their experience of the clinic. The feedback from the patients was overwhelmingly positive. To date the clinic has offered follow up to nearly 300 patients and is still in use. It has grown in size and has received input from the Belfast trust for further staffing and resources. The project recently received joint first prize in the innovation and transformation in care category for the Health and Social Care Quality Improvement (HSCQI) awards in the trust. Conclusion(s): This project highlights the essential requirement for follow-up after an intensive care admission with significant ongoing morbidity demonstrated in this patient cohort. It is currently still the only service with this breadth of MDT input in Northern Ireland. The initial use of MS Teams has allowed this service to run safely during a pandemic but it has since been adapted as the pandemic has evolved and is now offered to all Intensive care patients. Its collaborative platform allows for immediate communication throughout the whole team, and the ability for the team to be flexible. In essence, we have set up a unique and robust system that can be easily used to offer excellent follow up to Intensive care patients within the Belfast trust.

Childhood tuberculosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We discuss the most recent literature to support the identification of children at risk for tuberculosis and optimal testing and treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: The identification and management of children with tuberculosis has increased in complexity due to the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic, greater use of immunosuppressive agents, and the administration of shorter, rifamycin-containing treatment regimens. Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in children include: use of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs); molecular-based tests; and shorter courses of treatment. While the essential steps to identify and treat children at risk for tuberculosis remain unchanged, providers must be aware of impact of these challenges. SUMMARY: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will likely have a negative impact on global tuberculosis control. It is important that countries maintain a comprehensive approach to the identification and management of children at risk for tuberculosis. Increasing evidence supports enhanced utilization of IGRAs and molecular-based testing to improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. Shorter course, rifamycin-based treatment regimens are available to treat children with tuberculosis infection; however, their use is limited in some immunosuppressed children due to drug-drug interactions.

Quality Social Connection as an Active Ingredient in Digital Interventions for Young People With Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Scoping Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Disrupted social connections may negatively affect youth mental health. In contrast, sustained quality social connections (QSCs) can improve mental health outcomes. However, few studies have examined how these quality connections affect depression and anxiety outcomes within digital interventions, and conceptualization is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to conceptualize, appraise, and synthesize evidence on QSC within digital interventions (D-QSC) and the impact on depression and anxiety outcomes for young people aged 14-24 years. METHODS: A systematic scoping review and meta-analysis was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological frameworks and guided by experts with lived experience. Reporting was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched against a comprehensive combination of key concepts on June 24, 2020. The search concepts included young people, digital intervention, depression, anxiety, and social connection. Google was also searched. A reviewer independently screened abstracts and titles and full text, and 9.99% (388/3882) of these were screened by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis was used to structure the findings on indicators of D-QSC and mechanisms that facilitate the connection. Indicators of D-QSC from the included studies were synthesized to produce a conceptual framework. RESULTS: Of the 5715 publications identified, 42 (0.73%) were included. Among the included studies, there were 23,319 participants. Indicators that D-QSC was present varied and included relatedness, having a sense of belonging, and connecting to similar people. However, despite the variation, most of the indicators were associated with improved outcomes for depression and anxiety. Negative interactions, loneliness, and feeling ignored indicated that D-QSC was not present. In 24% (10/42) of the applicable studies, a meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in depression (-25.6%, 95% CI -0.352 to -0.160; P<.001) and anxiety (-15.1%, 95% CI -0.251 to -0.051; P=.003) after a D-QSC. Digital mechanisms that helped create a quality connection included anonymity, confidentiality, and peer support. In contrast, mechanisms that hindered the connection included disconnection from the real world and inability to see body language. Data synthesis also identified a 5-component conceptual framework of D-QSC that included rapport, identity and commonality, valued interpersonal dynamic, engagement, and responded to and accepted. CONCLUSIONS: D-QSC is an important and underconsidered component for youth depression and anxiety outcomes. Researchers and developers should consider targeting improved QSC between clinicians and young people within digital interventions for depression. Future research should build on our framework to further examine relationships among individual attributes of QSC, various digital interventions, and different populations.

CCopeY: A Mixed-Methods Coproduced Study on the Mental Health Status and Coping Strategies of Young People During COVID-19 UK Lockdown.

PURPOSE: Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on young people's mental health is an increasing priority. Studies to date are largely surveys and lack meaningful involvement from service users in their design, planning, and delivery. The study aimed to examine the mental health status and coping strategies of young people during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown using coproduction methodology. METHODS: The mental health status of young people (aged 16-24) in April 2020 was established utilizing a sequential explanatory coproduced mixed methods design. Factors associated with poor mental health status, including coping strategies, were also examined using an online survey and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Since the lockdown, 30.3% had poor mental health, and 10.8% had self-harmed. Young people identifying as Black/Black-British ethnicity had the highest increased odds of experiencing poor mental health (odds ratio [OR] 3.688, 95% CI .54-25.40). Behavioral disengagement (OR 1.462, 95% CI 1.22-1.76), self-blame (OR 1.307 95% CI 1.10-1.55), and substance use (OR 1.211 95% CI 1.02-1.44) coping strategies, negative affect (OR 1.109, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), sleep problems (OR .915 95% CI .88-.95) and conscientiousness personality trait (OR .819 95% CI .69-.98) were significantly associated with poor mental health. Three qualitative themes were identified: (1) pre-existing/developed helpful coping strategies employed, (2) mental health difficulties worsened, and (3) mental health and nonmental health support needed during and after lockdown. CONCLUSION: Poor mental health is associated with dysfunctional coping strategies. Innovative coping strategies can help other young people cope during and after lockdowns, with digital and school promotion and application.